Friday 18 November 2016

Theory on Stereotypes

Task 1:


Stereotypes aren't always negative: This is true in relation to the migrants, which are presented as the protagonists of the piece rather than villains like in some stereotypes. However, with the immigration officers, who are white, the stereotype is negative as they bully the less powerful.


They aren't always about minorities or less powerful groups: In the clip, this is true, as the stereotyped powerful white bullies are shown, however, the focus of this extract is on the less powerful migrants.


They can be held about one's own group: This is true, as the extract is aimed towards to majority white audience and is presenting a stereotype of white bullies.


They are not rigid or unchanging: The extract shows a change in society's stereotype with the woman on the front desk, as in the 40s-60s, the person on the front desk would have been a man but now its stereotyped as a woman, which is shown in the extract.


They aren't always false: Of course, there will be some white people that are bullies and there will be some migrants that act as protagonists but these are just stereotypes and are thus not true for everyone in the group.


Task 2:


The theory of Cognitive Dissonance is somewhat disproved by the success of programmes like Hotel Babylon. This is because the theory suggests that we seek out confirmation of our common stereotypes, thus being attracted to programmes that present these stereotypes. However, Hotel Babylon, and programmes like it, are unconventional, aiming to break these stereotype but their success opposes the theory of Cognitive Dissonance.


Task 3:


Alvarado's Racial Stereotype Theory:


Alvarado theorised that racial stereotypes will always be portrayed in one of 4 ways:
  • Pitied - Racial Stereotypes may be presented as weak, to make us feel superior, and that they need to be pitied. An example of this representation can be seen in the following clip (showing a pitied African stereotype):
  • Humorous - Racial Stereotypes may be used to humour the audience, using the stereotype as comic relief. An example of this representation can be seen below (showing a humorous Scottish stereotype):
  • Dangerous - Racial Stereotypes may be used to show the danger presented by particular groups and encourage the audience to fear them. This clip shows an example of this representation (showing a dangerous Asian stereotype):
  • Exotic - Racial Stereotypes may be used to show how different certain ethnicities are. Commonly, this is used to either with characters speaking different strange languages and eating uncommon foods. An example of this representation can be seen in this extract:



Wednesday 16 November 2016

The Big Six

1) Warner Bros. Pictures:



Comprising a whopping 19.7% of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Warner Bros. Pictures is the biggest player in the film industry. Securing the rights to major film franchises like Harry Potter, DC and The Matrix have made Warner Bros the biggest name in the business.
2) Paramount Pictures:

With 15.5% of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Paramount Pictures continues to be one of the most successful film production companies in the world. Star Trek, Mission Impossible and Transformers are just a few of the popular film franchises produced by Paramount Pictures.
3) Walt Disney:

One of the most renowned film production companies in the history of the business, Walt Disney now holds 15.3% of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). With highly successful movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, National Treasure and Star Wars, there's no doubt that Disney will continue to play a key role in the industry for years to come.
4) Columbia Pictures:

Comprising 12.9% of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures), Columbia Pictures remains a big player in the business. Some of this company's recent successes include the James Bond, the 'Angels and Demons' and the 2000 Spider-Man franchises.
5) Universal Studios:

12.2% of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures) belongs to Universal Studios, which continues to make millions for the film industry. With major hits like the Bourne series , The American Pie series and the Jurassic Park series, it's very clear that Universal Studios knows what it takes to make money in this industry.
6) 20th Century Fox:


This highly successful movie production company makes up 11.9% of the US/Canadian market share (2007 figures). Some of the biggest and most successful movies from this empire include the X-Men series, the Star Wars Prequels and Independence Day.

Tuesday 15 November 2016

DNA Films Questions



Who were the co-founders of DNA Films?
DNA films was founded by Andrew MacDonald and Duncan Kenworthy, however Kenworthy was later replaced by Allon Reich as head of the studio.

When was the company founded?
The studio was founded in 1983.

Where is DNA based?
DNA Films is based in the UK, with the head office being in London.

How many films have DNA Films produced?
DNA Films have produced 21 films, one of which is now in post-production, awaiting its release next year.

What awards have DNA Films won?
DNA Films have won several awards for their films including 28 Days Later which won 6 awards (including the Saturn Award's Best Horror Film in 2003), Love Actually which won 9 awards (including the Empire Award for Best British Film), Notes on a Scandal which won 8 awards (including the British Independent Film Award for Best Screenplay), The Last King of Scotland which won 6 awards (including three BAFTAs, for Best British Film, Best Actor for Forest Whitaker and Best Adapted Screenplay), Sunshine which won a single award (being the BIFA for Best Technical Achievement in 2007), Never Let Me Go which won 8 awards (including the Phoenix Film Critics Society Award for Overlooked Film) and Ex_Machina which won 19 Awards (including an Academy Award for Best Visual Effects).



How many full time staff does DNA Films employ?
There are three main full time staff at DNA Films, the heads of Andrew MacDonald and Allon Reich, as well as their secretary Joanne Ruth Smith.

List 5 box-office hits that DNA Films have made:
- 28 Days Later (2002) - Making $84.6 Million from its $8 Million budget
- Love Actually (2003) - Making $246.9 Million from its $45 Million budget
- The Last King of Scotland (2006) - Making $48.4 Million from its $6 Million budget
- 28 Weeks Later (2007) - Making $64.2 Million from its $15 Million budget
- Ex_Machina (2014) - Making $36.9 Million from its $15 Million budget

List 5 flops that DNA Films has made:
- The Parole Officer (2001) - Only making $3.976 Million on a $6 Million budget
- Sunshine (2007) - Only making $32 Million on a $40 Million budget
- Amelia (2009) - Only making $19.6 Million on a $40 Million budget
- Never Let Me Go (2010) - Only making $9.5 Million on a $15 Million budget
- Dredd (2012) - Only making $41.5 Million on a $45 Million budget

What is Danny Boyle's relationship with DNA Films?
Danny Boyle is a friend and collaborator with DNA Films, with them working together of 28 Days Later, Sunshine, 28 Weeks Later and T2: Trainspotting.

List 3 famous directors that DNA Films have worked?
- Danny Boyle
- Richard Curtis
- Mark Romanek (although famous for directing Music Videos)

List 5 famous actors who have starred in films made by DNA Films?
- Andrew Garfield
- Ewan McGreggor
- Karl Urban
- Keira Knightley
- Alan Rickman

What has been DNA Films highest grossing film?
Love Actually was their highest grossing film, with the box office take of $246.9.

What Hollywood studios have DNA Films worked with?
DNA films have previously worked with members of the big six, who helped to distribute films, with 20th Century Fox distributing 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later (through their division, Fox Searchlight) as well as Universal, who distributed Love Actually.

List two of DNA Films big blockbuster films and find out their budgets:
- Dredd (2012) - $45 Million
- Sunshine (2007) - $40 Million

What film is DNA Films most famous for?
Arguably, DNA Films most famous film is 28 Days Later.


What other genres do DNA Films films like to make?
DNA Films mostly make smaller, independent films, with the genres including drama, thriller, romance, sci-fi, action and historical.

Who have DNA Films entered into a partnership with for DNA TV Limited?
DNA TV Limited is their television division with is made in collaboration with the Fox Network Group (division of 21st Century Fox, one of the big six).

What information can you find out about DNA Films through their web page?
Contact information as well as a description of their collaboration with FOX for their TV division.


Saturday 5 November 2016

Ex_Machina - Review


Alex Garner's Ex_Machina was released on January 21st 2015, starring the talents of Domnhall Gleeson, Oscar Isaac and Alicia Vikander. The film also boasts the production pair of Alex MacDonald and Allon Reich, previously working together on Dredd, 28 Weeks Later and Never Let Me Go. The film follows Caleb (Domnhall Gleeson) as he wins a competition to spend a week with the entrepreneur, and boss of his company, Nathan (Oscar Isaac), that is until he uncovers the real reason for his visit, to perform a Turing Test on the first AI, Ava (Alicia Vikander).

Ex_Machina shows a fantastic amalgamation of the thriller, drama, terrestrial sci-fi and horror genre, with a provocative, claustrophobic and tense story revolving around the creation of an AI and the possible moral implications of this. The horror-like claustrophobia is fantastically built up, with its tiny cast (with three main stars, two supporting cast and a few unnamed appearances), the amazing set design (with many white and silver corridors) and the eerie, gorgeous music. The talent of the cast shines through in this, with Oscar Isaac playing the cocky, paranoid but depressed entrepreneur excellently, especially with his mastery over being able to flip between rage, excitement and sadness so smoothly but quickly. Domnhall Gleeson, whilst not showing the best performance, puts in a good performance as the intelligent but irrational Caleb, making his feelings for Ava seem real. However, without the fantastic acting of Alicia Vikander, who balanced robotic movements with human emotion. The film, despite its low $15 Million budget, demonstrates fantastic special effects with the design of Ava, making it look realistic in a fantastical manner. The film also shows fantastic stylized cinematography, which makes the film a pleasure to watch.

The story is expertly crafted, with mystery and twists woven through it, with Caleb's indecision of whether to trust Nathan or Ava along the watcher to be engaged in the plot more deeply. It also raises many moral questions of whether an AI would have the same rights as a human as well as a god vs creation theme running through. These moral elements were great additions and, unlike other provocative films, really discretely placed, so not to feel too forced. However, despite this, there are a few plot holes and continuity errors, most notably being Corey Johnson's helicopter pilot taking Ava away, no questions asked, as well as Ava taking skin, which is considerably different in skin tone, and it looking seamless on her. Yet, these plot holes are not hard to overlook. The ending is a special one, coming unexpectedly, mixing hope with despair to show the fates of the future for the characters in another moral dilema of if these new robots will replace us. 

Overall, the film is amazing, with a great cast, fantastic set design, music and effects, as well as an intriguing plot with great messages and morals. Despite a few missteps in the plot, this is almost a flawless movie, which both looks and feels great.

The film gets a strong 9/10.

 

Friday 4 November 2016

Disability in TV Drama

Game of Thrones - Tyrion Lannister

Despite the character of Tyrion being disabled, due to having dwarfism, his character is not hindered. The usual stereotype of a disabled character being weak and useless is broken by Tyrion, with his character having one of the best minds in the show as he takes up positions like Hand of the King, due to his power and mind. He also is one of the richest characters in the show, showing more of his power. However, despite that, his treatment from other characters is harsh due to his disability, with him being called insulting names like 'Imp' or 'Halfman' and even being disowned by his own father, Tywin.


Agents of SHIELD - Phil Coulson


The character of Coulson wasn't disabled until the season 2 finale, where he lost his left hand. Since the loss of his hand, the character hasn't been as much of an action hero as he was, perhaps showing that the disability has weakened him and disabled him from his previous life. However, he infrequently does become an action hero, even using his prosthetic hand to kill someone, showing part of his previous life being re-enabled. The other characters don't treat him any differently to before due to his disability, showing a break of the stereotype that disabled people get treated differently.


Star Trek: The Next Generation - Geordi La Forge

The character of La Forge is blind, seeing through the aid of a special visor. Despite the difference in appearance, the character isn't hindered by his disability, still being essential to the Enterprise's mission. Most characters don't treat him any differently due to his disability but occasionally he is mistreated by other characters due to his disability.